this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
55 points (98.2% liked)

Australia

3588 readers
184 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
55
Why do so few people cycle for transport in Australia? 6 ideas on how to reap all the benefits of bikes (theconversation.com)
submitted 5 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Reforming mandatory helmet laws, by either abolishing them altogether or making them applicable only on busy roads, would help. The laws deter mass uptake of cycling by framing getting on a bike as a dangerous extreme sport rather than a form of active mobility. The fact that they are applied to advertising as well, with tourism ads for Amsterdam having helmets photoshopped onto all the cyclists, further reinforces this framing and deters casual cyclists.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

But cycling is dangerous - do we really want to put our ideology ahead of peoples' safety? I'm not saying cars are safe, but they are required to have seat belts (which you are required to use) and I assume airbags are also mandatory. We shouldn't downplay the risks associated with an activity to get the "ignorant masses" to do it - that is misleading. We need more people out of cars and on bikes or public transport but we shouldn't get there by lying, good infrastructure will be a major factor.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 5 months ago

Statistically, it's been fairly well understood for a while now that the benefits of a larger number of people cycling outweigh the safety risk of some of those people not wearing a helmet.

Infrastructure and keeping people separate from cars is more important, but mandatory helmet laws are a net detriment to public health.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's entire swathes of people who just can't really have their hair messed up or it would affect them professionally. In Europe people tend to not wear helmets and it's not like it's a daily massacre in the streets.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago

I don’t like the whole Darwin-Awards/Eugenics dichotomy but I can’t comprehend anyone stupid enough to think that having a fancy haircut is more important than their brains being on the inside of their heads.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

If only one man dies of hunger, that is a tragedy. If millions die, that’s only statistics.

[–] theroff@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago

There are different types of cycling. I would always wear a helmet to work because I live 6km away and it's a decent ride. There are hills and I often get to a reasonable speed.

Compare that to someone living in South Brisbane commuting to the CBD, or someone going for a leisurely bike stroll on the riverwalk - they may not go fast at all. We don't wear helmets whilst walking or jogging, but why is it mandatory for a slow ride?

The big reason helmets can be offputting is because they can mess up your hair. If the city wants to encourage people who live relatively close to their jobs to ride in, more flexibility on helmets could be a good thing.

FWIW I do think helmet safety should always be encouraged. Riding down a hill? Going more than a leisurely stroll? Wear a helmet. Makes sense. But it's really not that necessary for people who are riding slow.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 5 months ago

I agree that the helmet laws are unnecessary, but I think they're far from the most important thing compared to having good infrastructure to ride on.