this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
531 points (98.9% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

33 readers
1 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/1078917

According to reports, producers expect writers will run out of money, possibly lose their homes and be forced to come to bargaining table. Producers denied these reports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] koreth@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm curious about the timing of this, because it seems to me that doing this while the writers are striking gives the actors less leverage. A bunch of productions are already shut down due to the writers' strike, so the actors on those productions also being on strike doesn't delay production or cost the studios any additional money.

Obviously not all productions were already shut down, so the strike does hurt the studios, but if I were a studio exec, I'd much rather have all the strikes happen at the same time to minimize the cost to me.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

They will have to have solidarity—no deal except a deal for both