this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
194 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2753 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (17 children)

Now I'm worried.

"stressing need for talks" is language used when a war is looming. Otherwise, constant talks between nations are something that doesn't need mentioning at all.

[–] CatOnTheChainWax@lemmy.today 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It would destabilize the global economy and trade. there is absolutely no chance anyone would risk that. Or maybe they would. who am I to know?.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We said the same thing about Putin invading Ukraine. We somehow believed that the neoliberal globalized economy would allow only wars to destabilize certain regions to make resource exploitation easier for the global powers. Well turns out eventually the global powers are facing off with each directly after running out of proxies.

[–] PahassaPaikassa@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

They said the same thing before WW1 as well. People back then were saying the world is too connected and a big war would disrupt everything so badly that no one would risk it.

But then the sleepwalking took over.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it would probably be a good opportunity for a handful of really rich people to further their control and ownership globally...so as long as our billionaire overlords value human life over their own personal power we should be good.

[–] CatOnTheChainWax@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

That's a good point...... Oh...oh no... Oceania is going to war with Eastasia and Eurasia

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We've been shifting imports out of China for quite a few years now. If you look at "made in" labels, I'm sure you've noticed that they've changed from China to Taiwan, Thailand, El Salvador, hell I got a shirt recently that was made in Jordan. I'd never seen that before.

While a lot of stuff is still made in China, that shift means it won't cause a huge destabilization, at least for the US. Of course it will still cause problems, but they're already trying to limit the potential damage.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Pandemic accelerated it a lot. Couple projects I was on were to move production lines out of China to Mexico, Malaysia, and India. The move to India was pre-pandemic to avoid Trump tariffs. The other two were during the pandemic to avoid Chinese lockdowns.

load more comments (13 replies)