this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
57 points (73.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9639 readers
323 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What? They are right. But that doesn't mean it's a pro car argument. Cars are definitely safer as bicycles can't utter wrecks you like they do to bicycles

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

From what I recall it really depends on how you classify danger. Bikes are more dangerous for non-lethal injuries. But any car trip that you drive over 45 mph is slightly more lethal than biking per comparable trip. So it depends on what danger you're willing to risk.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you're driving over 45mph, there's likely not a comparable bike trip.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

By comparable, I mean from point a to point b. If you have a 10 mile commute to work, you have a slightly higher lethality driving a car on a highway, than biking to work, but you have a higher chance of non-lethal injury by biking.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unless you're also biking on the highway, it's not comparable.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Maybe comparable was the wrong word but I think think your using that to intentionally miss my point. When assessing the risk of a commute, if you are looking at per mile risk, biking is less lethal but more injury prone.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 months ago

So what, does the comment I replied to make sense to people? It has many upvotes but to me seems complete nonsense.