this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
437 points (96.6% liked)

Comic Strips

12638 readers
4458 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

They could have just had Cut and Paste help with harvesting ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Then Copy could have devalued the crops by multiplying them to the point they cost nothing. ๐Ÿ˜Š

[โ€“] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Honestly would that ever actually be a bad thing?

Like I really can't fathom a realistic way producing too much food (or whatever they're growing) can be a problem.

And before anyone brings up the economy I'd rather there be so much food it's worthless than what we have now.

[โ€“] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago

Might be a carbon and unwanted other animal species issues. Bugs, small mammals, and predators thereof. Compost is great but it's still producing by-products. If distribution and politics could be solved (probably politics is the main barrier in distribution, followed by natural disaster, many of which are the direct result of politics), perhaps these things wouldn't be a great concern. But I'm not a scientist.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)