this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
437 points (96.6% liked)

Comic Strips

12638 readers
4552 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Honestly would that ever actually be a bad thing?

Like I really can't fathom a realistic way producing too much food (or whatever they're growing) can be a problem.

And before anyone brings up the economy I'd rather there be so much food it's worthless than what we have now.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'd rather there be so much food it's worthless than what we have now.

You're not wrong, but when food is worthless there's no reason to grow it. Farms cost money to run. Now a solution could be to nationalize or subsidize farms completely so that the tax dollars put into them directly lower the cost of food, but that ain't happening.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Probably not, but it's better than subsidizing farmers to not sell stuff and crash the market. That's just doubling down on waste.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago

Might be a carbon and unwanted other animal species issues. Bugs, small mammals, and predators thereof. Compost is great but it's still producing by-products. If distribution and politics could be solved (probably politics is the main barrier in distribution, followed by natural disaster, many of which are the direct result of politics), perhaps these things wouldn't be a great concern. But I'm not a scientist.