this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
508 points (96.2% liked)

Greentext

4322 readers
1354 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Katanas are not actually that sharp. I mean, it’ll kill you just fine, but it’s almost more like a big machete than a sword.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

Nah, they are sharp, but flimsy.

They were designed to cut-off unprotected limbs. Since iron was very scarce in feudal Japan. So metal armours weren't really a thing for the majority.

Put them up against an European sword, where they did have more pure iron ore and they will break.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah there is so much disinformation about katanas from basement kids in the 90s/00s.

They are really impressive cause shit steel ended making a pretty good sword but most of the trick is the curve and the sawing action it makes you do if you swing correctly to cut through stuff like a chefs knife. But you do want it sharp, and free of burs so that it doesn't get stuck part way in.

But you'd be up against a big stick with metal bolts in it that would win the fight mostly anyways.