this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
198 points (95.0% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2753 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's really not hard to go through a conversation chain.

https://lemmy.world/comment/10300436

But I notice you ignored all the stuff about the source being far right, so I'm guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I care about the facts and the truth, not the source, as should you.

But I notice you ignored all the left-wing sources I provided that demonstrates the new areas in China are populated and not “ghost cities,” so I'm guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is what you said which started this conversation:

I was just reading about it. It’s another web encyclopedia trying to incorporate other encyclopedias to compete against Wikipedia’s biases.

I showed you that the whole thing is about Wikipedia not having a right-wing bias.

I thought you cared about facts and truth?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I do. I admitted Justapedia was a biased source:

Edit: I read through the [page](https://justapedia.org/wiki/Fascism) on Fascism. It’s crap, runaway.

but the references linked were credible.

I’ll admit when I’m wrong, will you?

Five studies, including two from Harvard researchers, have found a left-wing bias at Wikipedia:

  • A Harvard study found Wikipedia articles are more left-wing than Encyclopedia Britannica.
  • Another paper from the same Harvard researchers found left-wing editors are more active and partisan on the site.
  • 2018 analysis found top-cited news outlets on Wikipedia are mainly left-wing.
  • Another analysis using AllSides Media Bias Ratings™ found that pages on American politicians cite mostly left-wing news outlets.
  • American academics foundconservative editors are 6 times more likely to be sanctioned in Wikipedia policy enforcement. source
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When did I say Wikipedia didn't have a bias? Please quote me.

Again, if you care about the truth, you'll show where I made that claim that you think you're refuting.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe I misread it. I’m not concerned with winning an argument, only with correcting the misinformation about “ghost cities.” I did that. Now I just have to wait for Legoland Sichuan to open in 2025 in the new state-level are of Tianfu. Hopefully it won’t be too crowded, since it’s a “ghost city.”

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

"Maybe" you misread what?

I never claimed Wikipedia had no bias. I never even implied it.

You berated me for not caring about facts and truth, then you lied about me, now you won't even admit it was a lie.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I continually try to de-escalate, and disengage. And you continue to antagonize and misrepresent my intent.

Take a breath. I’m not worth the amount of energy you’re putting into this.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, it seems you don't actually care about facts and truth.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Leave me alone. This is borderline harassment.