this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1428 readers
276 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
25
The Google AI isn’t hallucinating about glue in pizza, it’s just over indexing an 11 year old Reddit post by a dude named fucksmith. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 6 months ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/techtakes@awful.systems
172 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Source

I see Google's deal with Reddit is going just great...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

TBH I'm curious what the difference between this and "hallucinating" would be.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think 'hallucinating' means when it makes up the source/idea by (effectively) word association that generates the concept, rather than here it's repeating a real source.

[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Couldn't that describe 95% of what LLMs?

It is a really good auto complete at the end of the day, just some times the auto complete gets it wrong

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, nicely put! I suppose 'hallucinating' is a description of when, to the reader, it appears to state a fact but that fact doesn't at all represent any fact from the training data.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well it's referencing something so the problem is the data set not an inherent flaw in the AI

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i'm pretty sure that referencing this indicates an inherent flaw in the AI

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No it represents an inherent flaw in the people developing the AI.

That's a totally different thing. Concept is not flawed the people implementing the concept are.

[–] ebu@awful.systems 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Of course, this flexibility that allows for anything good and popular to be part of a natural, inevitable precursor to the true metaverse, simultaneously provides the flexibility to dismiss any failing as a failure of that pure vision, rather than a failure of the underlying ideas themselves. The metaverse cannot fail, you can only fail to make the metaverse."

-- Dan Olson, The Future is a Dead Mall