this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1003 points (95.3% liked)

Antiwork

8275 readers
2 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
uthredii@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
yogthos@lemmy.ml
mossy@lemmy.ml
1003
That's all it is. (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"too" implies

a) they don't matter yet

and

b) mattering is a new concept we should consider.

The statement is clear without modifier and requires no qualification, clarification or context: do black lives matter or not?

Or to take the inverse: under what circumstances do black lives not matter? If the answer is "there are none" then obviously black lives matter.

[–] Naboo_calls_for_aid@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

You're not wrong, I guess the biggest issue with it being misconstrued was by people who watch Fox news, but honestly Fox news was gonna find a way to spin it no matter what.

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm not sure if you're arguing for or against "too".

Because yah, police specifically, and society generally, have been acting as though black lives don't matter. And the slogan "black lives matter" was created to argue against that idea. But it was easily confusing. Hell I was immediately confused the first time I heard it, and actually thought "Well yah. All lives matter. What are they talking about?" It took me a good min or two to understand. But simply adding the "too" immediately clarifies that.

"Black lives matter" isn't wrong. It's just not immediately as clear as it could be.