this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
137 points (72.3% liked)

Vegan

2962 readers
1 users here now

An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.

Rules and miscellaneous:

  1. We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
  2. No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
  3. Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
  4. Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
  5. All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] qyron@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

i'm going to ignore your posting history and assume for a moment you aren't a contrarian debate pervert.

Thank you for your consideration.

why do you feel the need to agree with people but then say 'but that's not how it works today'?

Because those people are correct. But at the same time, right now, there is no viable option (to my knowledge) to completely erase the things we agree on.

i see these types of comments in every comment section about societal problems. 'i agree X needs to change to Y, but we don't have Y today, sweaty. ๐Ÿ’…' like- what? are you all really just trolls, or do you really think you're being insightful and helpful? because this isn't what a discussion looks like. it's dis-miss-ion.

I'm not dismissing anything; I'm admiting it is wrong while at the same time admiting there are no alternatives to end it today, tomorrow or in the foreseeable future.

The simple admission of something being wrong, opens the doors to debate. Debate generates change of thought. Change of thought enacts action.

We do not need to fully agree on anything and none of us is required to understand the other perspective but at best we may be cordial enough to respect that we are in our right to hold different opinions, without the need to consider the other is mocking us.