Gaming

20015 readers

669 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Metallinatus@lemmy.ml

peternile@lemmy.ml

Ubisoft insists yet again that its uncanny AI-generated 'NEO-NPCs' will make games 'more alive and richer', whatever that means (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 6 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The best models right now still hallucinate, so no matter how well trained, they're still going to be awful. The specific message isn't the issue.

They have no object permanence and you can convince them of things by just repeating it to them enough times. But the worst part?

They're not even fun to talk to.

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So if they don't hallucinate, have object permanence, and are fun to talk to, you're all good with gen AI NPCs?

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Those are not my ONLY issues, no. They're the most egregious for a videogame right now, but the entire concept is just .. Fluff for no reason other than to list "AI NPCs" on the box.

Paying for more writers is simply better all around.

[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

I don't get it. Actually well working AI NPCs sound fucking amazing. To have an actual conversation about anything in the game by typing your questions? That's like the wet dream of an RPG.

Have writers write the background info, some lore stuff, "books" about stuff in the game etc.

I want to have a conversation with all the NPCs and choose from four premade questions about a quest I am on.

And yes, obviously they have to work well or they're extremely awkward and anti-immersive.

[–] applepie@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

Paying for labour is toxic to any self respecting capitalist

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

And do you believe paying for more writers will remain a better option for the foreseeable future?