this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
146 points (98.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8767 readers
431 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (15 children)

Well, if you have access to an alpha version, you're basically a tester. It makes no sense to do anything like a review on an alpha version.

[–] Toes@ani.social 1 points 7 months ago (8 children)

I disagree, people provide helpful reviews for closed beta games all the time. These help inform users on the trajectory of the development, core aspects of the story and main gameplay loop.

If you're exposing your game to the public, public opinion is expected and deserved.

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 4 points 7 months ago

Alpha and beta aren't really the same though. Alpha is meant to be unstable and feature incomplete while beta is supposed to be simply missing polish. For Alpha reviews to have real value they need to provide that context. Otherwise, it's just an exercise for the reviewer

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)