this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

Personal Finance

3819 readers
1 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except that 401ks are invested. By default they tend to be invested in a relatively stable, diverse portfolio along the standard long-term investment guidelines of ~60/40 balance of stocks and fixed or cash holdings. Mine made 15% last year invested even more conservatively than that, and it's a no-name 401k provides by my small employer. I would have made significantly less with gold.

If you think people's 401ks are just sitting there in a low-interest checking account, I don't think you understand how they're actually structured.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I understand. I get that the money is invested in things that will grow over time, but you're still having to take risk in order to get that return. Otherwise, what happens is you lose your money to inflation. At least with gold, it's a steady rise and will not fluctuate a whole lot. Gold holds your purchasing power with very little risk at all.

[–] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

You'd find very few financial advisors or experts who would recommend putting your retirement portfolio entirely in gold.