this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
292 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
998 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Better to just wipe out Windows entirely and be done with it.

[–] Woozythebear@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And then what? What's going to replace it? As of right now there is no alternative that can do what windows can do. There are other operating systems that can do some of the stuff but not all of it.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What can windows as an operating system do that no other can do? Do they have magical scheduling?

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Run Vectric Aspire for one thing.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That’s not due to the operating system but rather the choice of those producing the program. The operating system simply provides an interface to the underlying hardware.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The OS provides services to the application, acting as a bridge between the application and the physical hardware. The entire point of an OS is to run applications, otherwise it would serve no purpose.

If the app can run in Windows on the same hardware that Linux can, but the app can't run in Linux, then the only difference is the OS.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but this is a design choice made by those who make the app, not a design choice made by those that make the operating system.

If I make a screwdriver that isn’t compatible with any screws on the market, that is my poor design choice, not that of screw manufacturers.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

True, but that doesn't change the fact that Linux can't run the application.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or you know, the fact that the application can’t run on Linux.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you want to be pedantic, be pedantic. The OS is what loads and runs the application.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but windows was not designed for the application. The application was designed for windows. This is a huge difference and blame for it not running on Linux should be placed at the producers of the application, not the os. If you want to criticize an os, then do so by looking at what does and does not work in the hardware interface, not by listing applications that have been designed for particular systems.

For all I know, windows could be the worst thing ever to develop applications for, but since it’s the most popular OS, most companies targets it for development. It doesn’t make it a better os.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I'm not arguing about whose fault it is at all. I know very well that it's the app's fault. But that does not change the fact that Linux can't run the app.

I'm also not criticizing Linux. I use Linux on my desktop and I'm very happy with it. I'm just stating the simple fact that Linux can't run the app.

Linux also can't change the oil in my car. That's not a criticism, it's just a fact.

[–] Woozythebear@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The question is what can't it do? Yall keep saying switch to Linux but why? Why would I leave windows if Linux isn't offering anything better?

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why would I leave windows if Linux isn’t offering anything better?

Because Linux offers an ad-free experience, whereas Windows offers a free ads experience.

[–] Woozythebear@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I currently don't have ads soooooooo

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Are you using the group policy editor?

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Well, as operating systems go, they both accomplish pretty much the same thing: an interface for programs so that they get access to hardware resources. One thing that Linux does is that it supports many more architectures than what windows does.

In windows, the UI is a part of the operating system so customization is a lot harder than what it is in Linux.

These are the only things that I can think of that are directly tied to the operating systems, but I’m not the most knowledgeable on these things. I honestly wonder what makes windows better as an operating system, because I can’t find anything.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That’s a nice generalization and all, but mostly just a lackluster cop-out that I’ve heard a million times. It’s not like windows is some high and mighty operating system which is the only thing capable of running some software because it’s so awesome. Linux is really good at a lot of things like gaming, security, data analytics, and continues to get better. Lots of money was put into developing windows and making it usable for most people. If more money was put towards the development of Linux for the purpose of , you’d have one less thing to bitch about.