this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
100 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16745 readers
956 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In recent times, triple-A publishers have repeatedly had their lunch eaten — at least, in terms of mindshare — by more creatively nimble indiesLethal Companywas last holiday season’s breakout hit, andPalworld followed not long afterBalatroand Manor Lords have come out of nowhere to tear up the Steam charts, as have mind-bogglingly fast riffs on this new paradigm like the Lethal Company-inspired Content WarningHelldivers 2 is both the exception that proves the rule and an example of exactly why big publishers should let studios cook even in the face of only modest success (or failure!). WithoutHelldivers 1, a relative unknown, you don’t get Helldivers 2the biggest breakout hit of the year. Recent triple-A darlings like Baldur’s Gate 3 and Elden Ring come from similar lineages.

Yes, it’s a slow year for triple-A publishers, but that’s what happens when you spend years quietly canceling projects that you’re worried *might *not achieve such a spectacular liftoff as to take over the entire universe. Eventually, it catches up with you. And years from now — already a record year for layoffs — it’s gonna catch up with the video game industry again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thegreekgeek@midwest.social 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"Why aren't we making more money?!?" Cries Phil Spencer while wringing the neck of yet another golden goose.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 10 points 6 months ago

Exec, as he swallows the last bite, of the last liver, of the last goose: "yeah that's a fun analogy, but sometimes there's nothing quite like a good foie gras"

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's like they don't consider Game Pass plays as the game being successful/profitable. They need to reconsider all that.

[–] Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Thing is, it’s not because it’s not translating to new game pass subscriptions. It’s not bringing them in more money, and that’s what matters to them. They aren’t getting enough from game pass to pay for development, not after the giant expense of buying Activision.