this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
360 points (96.6% liked)

Comics

5887 readers
24 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Huschke@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Is it just me, or does the comic not make any sense? Wouldn't a rich person always go for the money, thus the people surviving? A better version would be to put the money next to bound people, which would force the rich person to make a choice between money and saving people.

EDIT: Thanks for the clarification. I guess I play too many video games. :)

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, you're reading it wrong. The trolley destroys what it runs over. An easy way to imagine it instead of money's say property. You have 4 people on one line, or your nice shiny car on another. If you choose the people over the car, you've killed 4 people just to keep your car. In like vein, this rich person can either destroy potential profits but save lives, or he can choose to save the profit over the lives of multiple people.

I don't see how your version works: it would be destroying both.

[–] SteposVenzny@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

Huschke's version could work if the rich guy wants to destroy money that isn't his in order to make own money more valuable, like I'm pretty sure was the plot of the movie Goldfinger.

Also I guess the green dude blew up the mint shortly before this happened so destroyed money can't just be replaced.

[–] Peptoshotz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

A train hitting bags of money doesn't collect them.