this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
19 points (95.2% liked)
Android
9355 readers
1 users here now
A place to discuss anything related to Android or Android adjacent.
INFO:
-
No attacking others based on their phone preferences. Criticizing OEMs/devices is allowed. Attacking users because a different brand/device works for them isn't.
-
Obvious spam will be removed.
-
Anything directly or indirectly related to Android is allowed.
Check Out Our Partner Communities:
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It was brand new at the time come to think of it, it wasn't released until 2008 so this more likely happened in 2009. The timing and the dramatic difference from stock to jailbroken is just too striking to have been a coincidence, although you might be alleviating some 15-16 year old guilt, that perhaps it triggered something. Still very worrying that a new and very expensive phone was triggered in to dysfunction from the process but maybe it was unlucky defective model. I definitely think that while it was jailbroken the problems were as a result of the OS but maybe the Cydia apps or something else were particularly draining and then that fast draining cycle triggered something else physically.
Yeah if it was brand new, it might also have been defective, I've seen that happen. It's just between jailbreak and manufacturing defect, which do we default to? Depends on the whole timeline really.
It's not impossible it broke it, but anyway the Pixel is made for that so it's a lot less sketchy to begin with. It's the same risk as installing an OS on a PC really.
Google releases betas and developer previews for the Pixel, it's made to survive buggy code.