this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
108 points (99.1% liked)

Audiobooks

232 readers
10 users here now

For talk of all things audiobook related!

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I definitely do not want to support this practice, but there's no way to filter these out ๐Ÿ˜ .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I very much understand the misgivings about this, and certain parts make me uncomfortable with it, too. But this could be revolutionary for media accessibility, and in my mind could easily be worth it for the ability to make new media immediately accessible to folks with vision challenges, deaf and hard of hearing individuals, and a lot of other folks for whom most media is not easily interactive/accessible. For many people in this situation, you wait months after a traditional version of something is published before an accessible version is released, if it ever is. Often, it's just not seen as worth a publisher's time to make their content accessible to an audience they don't see as significantly profitable.

Like the printing press took jobs from scribes, but had far more significant impacts democratizing information and education, so might AI in the long run.

[โ€“] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But this could be revolutionary for media accessibility, and in my mind could easily be worth it for the ability to make new media immediately accessible to folks with vision challenges, deaf and hard of hearing individuals, and a lot of other folks for whom most media is not easily interactive/accessible

As an accessibility add-on / upgrade to standard TTS, sure. Sounds great, even. But I will not accept soulless, robotic, AI-generated voices for something being sold as an audiobook. I just won't.

[โ€“] ThePantser@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What about if we sweeten the deal and allow you to choose the voice actor on the fly? Want Star wars novels read by James Earl Jones, or Tolkien read by Arnold Schwarzenegger? You can have that with AI voices.

[โ€“] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lol, there is no sweetening the deal. Every one of those is a lost job opportunity for an actual voice actor.

[โ€“] ThePantser@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Except many books get read by the author or never get read at all so it opens new opportunities for people who wouldn't ever use audio books or books who never will get audio version now vision impaired people have the option to hear them.

[โ€“] ptz@dubvee.org 7 points 6 months ago

TTS already exists for the visually impaired. Amazon can use AI voices for that all they want (they're better than the default TTS now). Just don't sell me an "audiobook" that's not read by a person.

[โ€“] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How about opening up new opportunities for real (if unknown) voice actors to read these books for people?

[โ€“] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev -1 points 6 months ago

There'd be a market for that, just like there's a market for handmade furniture.

[โ€“] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago

What if Amazon sold TTS voice packages that can read any novel in your catalogue? "Hello yes I would like the James Earl Jones voice package and every Star Wars book ever written please." But the existing audiobook storefront still had only audiobooks read by real people in it, protecting their jobs.