Firefox

17937 readers

22 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

1054

Firefox now has speed parity with Chrome on the Speedometer benchmark (mozilla.social)

submitted 1 year ago by garam@lemmy.my.id to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

152 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1376783

Thought I'd never see the day when Firefox would match Chrome on Speedometer.

There's also a few other benchmarks got a sizable boost. https://arewefastyet.com/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So when Google removed don't be evil, they really meant it. It shows more and more each day.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn't remove "don't be evil". It's still there today: https://abc.xyz/investor/google-code-of-conduct/ (final paragraph)

[–] JshKlsn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow. I've heard that rumour being spread all over the place for YEARS now, and you're the first to pull up proof that it's still there. Interesting!

[–] Corgisocks@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It looks like the code of conduct used to include a preface about don't be evil, that's what was removed.

“Preface Don’t be evil.” Googlers generally apply those words to how we serve our users. But “Don’t be evil” is much more than that. Yes, it’s about providing our users unbiased access to information, focusing on their needs and giving them the best products and services that we can. But it’s also about doing the right thing more generally – following the law, acting honorably, and treating co-workers with courtesy and respect.

The Google Code of Conduct is one of the ways we put “Don’t be evil” into practice.”

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"Who put this 'Don't' here? We'll just get rid of that!"

[–] ThoughtGoblin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They're just build flags or compiler versions being different, no need to be melodramatic.

[–] IlllIIIlllIlllI@programming.dev -2 points 1 year ago

“We’re open source but not open source enough to your liking” is a VERY strange criteria for “evil” when most other commercial software companies are not open source at all.