The @nytimes has published sensitive tactical details about the US arms deliveries to #Ukraine which leads to very specific risks of Russia intercepting these deliveries. Is this necessary? I don't think so.

https://www.dialog.ua/war/294421_1714936204

@ukraine

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

yes, nyt is shit. however it's important we ask ourselves questions:

where did they get this info?
how sensitive are this info anyway? aren't they available to public?

also, i got blocked by the site. do they have the article in question in there?

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

None of this is 'sensitive information'. Its not as though the nyt got some scoop about weapon deliveries and against US gov wishes printed it.

Considering that NYT is liberal, often the target of conservatives and republicans. And that it has been many conservatives and republicans who seem to practically be rooting for Putin. Conservatives and republicans who caused the delay for funding Ukraine, this whole piece seems off the mark and somewhat paranoid.