The @nytimes has published sensitive tactical details about the US arms deliveries to #Ukraine which leads to very specific risks of Russia intercepting these deliveries. Is this necessary? I don't think so.

https://www.dialog.ua/war/294421_1714936204

@ukraine

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What is sensitive about these details? The NYT cutout in the link lists deliveries after they've been made, so how would they be intercepted?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe the problem is that if Russia knows where and when ammunition was received, even if it's a few days ago, they can intercept it on its way to the frontlines?
I can't read the article, maybe someone else can give better explanation?

[–] mapto@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Researching on time and place of arrival is a nice gift for anyone who wants to intercept these and is being cut off from doing this research themselves.

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 1 points 6 months ago

Haha, This commentary is paranoid nonsense. Intercept deliveries after they're made? Russia now has time travel? Locations named like 'Poland', 'Spain'? Oh wow, thats some serious location giveaway. If the war is going bad, don't make excuses for hypothetical security concerns which somehow got past the US govt and Pentagon from a newspaper?? If anything focus on who caused the delays for those weapons to arrive which is an actual issue, no time travel need.