DACH - jetzt auf feddit.org

8713 readers

1 users here now

Diese Community wird zum 01.07 auf read-only gestellt. Durch die anhäufenden IT-Probleme und der fehlende Support wechseln wir als Community auf www.feddit.org/c/dach - Ihr seid herzlich eingeladen auch dort weiter zu diskutieren!

Das Sammelbecken auf feddit für alle Deutschsprechenden aus Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg und die zwei Belgier. Außerdem natürlich alle anderen deutschprechenden Länderteile der Welt.

Für länderspezifische Themen könnt ihr euch in folgenden Communities austauschen:

Eine ausführliche Sidebar findet ihr hier: Infothread: Regeln, Feedback & sonstige Infos

Auch hier gelten die Serverregeln von https://feddit.de !

Banner: SirSamuelVimes

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

New German research shows EVs break down at less than half the rate of combustion engine cars. (www.adac.de)

submitted 6 months ago by Cokeser@feddit.de to c/dach@feddit.de

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://futurology.today/post/1354641

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Not surprising given the drastically reduced number of moving parts in an EV Powertrain vs an IC Powertrain.

Interestingly though I suspect the high percentage of battery related issues will in turn manage to keep the average maintenance bill at about the same. Granted that's a problem likely to be fixed with improved battery technologies and the reduced frequency of problems is worth something in itself.

[–] ThoGot@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

One thing I'm wary of is planned obsolescence like in almost every other electr(on)ic device

[–] phneutral@feddit.de 12 points 6 months ago

That’s why a real right to repair is so important.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I want one billionair who has enough of this bullshit and starts a company that builds stuff to last. It would be a goldmine, I'm sure. Because if people build trust in this brand they will gladly pay a good price for cars, dishwashers or printers that are durable and easy to repair.
Or do we have to do this by ourselfs somehow?

[–] statist43@feddit.de 7 points 6 months ago

But thats sadly not what makes billions ist seems...

[–] anlumo@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

Apple used to be that way, but they too got caught in the enshittification cycle.

It’s just too easy to build up a brand and then sell cheap shit for big money.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm curious, are you talking about batteries or ev in general?

[–] ThoGot@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Both. I imagine EVs with an Apple-like repair policy would be a nightmare

[–] onion@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

Would? You can buy a Tesla today

[–] Starfighter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The 44.1% battery failure figure is regarding the "starter" battery (12V) and is combined from all vehicles in the study (EV and ICE).

The HV Battery for the traction drive is grouped together with any kind of motor failure and comes in at 22.8 %. But this figure also includes ICE vehicles ejecting piston rods etc.

The only EV vs ICE numbers stated directly are the total breakdowns per 1000 vehicles at 1.9 (EV) and 3.6 (ICE).

I'd be really interested in a chart showing the failure categories separated by EV and ICE.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

I'd be really interested in a chart showing the failure categories separated by EV and ICE.

It's in there. Right under

Bauteile: Wo Elektroautos im Vorteil sind