this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
8 points (83.3% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3206 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So both Rivian and Tesla have or say they are going to have range extenders for their trucks, but in both cases even if they are removable and rentable they are huge as trucks are huge. In teslas case it seems to be a permanent change though.

What about commuter cars though?

One thing we really need is cheaper in city commuters and those don't need a long range. That brings costs down and gets more people into EVs, but those will get relegated to 2nd cars in many cases.

If those commuter cars could go to a shop and get an extender added in the trunk though that would make them much more capable of longer trips as well while keeping costs down.

If the battery rental is similar or less to renting a car for the same period then people would opt to use their own car for the longer trip and all the personal comforts that provides.

The batteries would be much smaller as well for a smaller vehicle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boinkage@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lithium ion batteries are huge though, one that would fit in a trunk wouldn't add very much range. Maybe 60 miles at most. And then you've lost all your trunk space, which is usually pretty needed on car trips to begin with. Far more important is reliable and plentiful fast chargers along major highway routes. Even an EV with a modest range can handle long car trips if there are fast chargers available and in the right locations.

They would also somehow have to plug into a temperature control system which would be very tricky and involve connecting hydraulics. Good EVs have heating/cooling systems dedicated to their batteries. You would need temp control with the battery which adds a whole level of fiddliness.

Tesla has been saying for years that they are going to make swappable batteries an option, but it just doesn't make any sense compared to just having more and better fast chargers available.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm not so sure they'd be as huge as you might think though.

It's huge on the trucks because the trucks are huge. The CT extender is almost as big as a standard range vehicles battery.

The extenders size would be proportional to the size of the vehicle and i think battery size doesn't grow linearly so smaller could be substantially smaller, but i might be wrong on that part.

Tesla ditched swapping batteries as a drive up service ages ago and hasn't talked about doing that since. This would be different as it'd be a service appointment, not a park it for 5 min and swap it out.

Both Rivian and Tesla supposedly solved the cooling problem on their trucks,so it's really just how much does that increase the size, and would the option to even do it make it prohibitively expensive on an inexpensive car.