this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
7 points (61.3% liked)

Technology

34920 readers
161 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Before watching the video, I was thinking all maglevs were just gagetbahns since there's little difference in how maglevs are used vs conventional HSR, but 380 mph and 100+ mile long tracks make a qualitative difference as it competes with aircraft after you consider boarding, taxiing, time to get to cruising altitude, etc. This is especially important given how much CO2 per passenger mile small aircraft generate.

Also if the US can spend trillions on wars, and has a similarly sized economy, I'm sure the Chinese can afford socially beneficial projects like this even if ticket prices never cover operating costs.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Indeed, at one point in the video he points out how the current rail network in China cost the same as US military budget for a single year. A maglev network would basically make domestic flying obsolete I think. If you can just go to the rail station downtown, hop on, and get off downtown of another city, that's straight up better experience than having to go to an airport, wait for boarding, etc. It's also far better for the environment.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

China's HSR has an issue in that it doesn't go to the city centers, you still have to take a metro or bus to get there.

I can't imagine how difficult it's gonna be getting land for maglev. Shanghai's maglev was supposed to connect the Hongqiao and Pudong airports, but they got NIMBY'd by property owners who wanted a bigger setback and used FUDD to organize protests.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maglevs tend to have wheels that get deployed on approach, so I don't think that's a big issue. The property owners is likely a trickier problem to deal with, but even if you make it to the edge of the city and take public transit from there, that's still pretty convenient.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maglevs tend to have wheels that get deployed on approach, so I don’t think that’s a big issue.

I don't understand what this is addressing

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Ih I misread your reply where you were talking about land, I thought you were talking about landing the maglev for some reason.