Games

16742 readers

923 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

152

Helldivers: Internal discussions are ongoing about the mandatory linking change. The response from our dev team has been pretty universally negative and we're looking for better options. (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 50MYT@aussie.zone 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not every big company does this.

I work for a fortune 500. We had a "the customers are not going to be pleased" change get pushed to us, and a lot of internal backlash/pushback prevented it from happening.

A competitor then did the thing we stopped, and got reamed by the public hard enough to set the standard of "your a dumbass if you even think about this".

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's what I'm talking about though. The stupid changes usually get caught, but you still have someone there who thought it was a good idea.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

And more importantly, while the stupid change itself might have been caught it usually doesn't translate into a lesson not to listen to the person with the stupid idea next time.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's the nature of collaborative problem solving though. I've proposed some dumb ideas before. I'm sure you have too. There's nothing wrong with stupid ideas being proposed. The issues arise when you either are surrounded by yes-men or are too forceful and ignore the advice of everyone else.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So... when it stops being collaboration?

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

edit: original post was in response to another comment. My bad.

Yeah, once it stops being collaborative, it becomes a problem. The original act of just proposing a stupid idea is fine, because it's collaborative, but as soon as one person (company,entity...) becomes too imposing to say no to, it's just bad times.