this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
25 points (85.7% liked)

Singularity | Artificial Intelligence (ai), Technology & Futurology

6 readers
1 users here now

About:

This sublemmy is a place for sharing news and discussions about artificial intelligence, core developments of humanity's technology and societal changes that come with them. Basically futurology sublemmy centered around ai but not limited to ai only.

Rules:
  1. Posts that don't follow the rules and don't comply with them after being pointed out that they break the rules will be deleted no matter how much engagement they got and then reposted by me in a way that follows the rules. I'm going to wait for max 2 days for the poster to comply with the rules before I decide to do this.
  2. No Low-quality/Wildly Speculative Posts.
  3. Keep posts on topic.
  4. Don't make posts with link/s to paywalled articles as their main focus.
  5. No posts linking to reddit posts.
  6. Memes are fine as long they are quality or/and can lead to serious on topic discussions. If we end up having too much memes we will do meme specific singularity sublemmy.
  7. Titles must include information on how old the source is in this format dd.mm.yyyy (ex. 24.06.2023).
  8. Please be respectful to each other.
  9. No summaries made by LLMs. I would like to keep quality of comments as high as possible.
  10. (Rule implemented 30.06.2023) Don't make posts with link/s to tweets as their main focus. Melon decided that the content on the platform is going to be locked behind login requirement and I'm not going to force everyone to make a twitter account just so they can see some news.
  11. No ai generated images/videos unless their role is to represent new advancements in generative technology which are not older that 1 month.
  12. If the title of the post isn't an original title of the article or paper then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format "Original title: {title here}".
  13. Please be respectful to each other.

Related sublemmies:

!auai@programming.dev (Our community focuses on programming-oriented, hype-free discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) topics. We aim to curate content that truly contributes to the understanding and practical application of AI, making it, as the name suggests, “actually useful” for developers and enthusiasts alike.)

Note:

My posts on this sub are currently VERY reliant on getting info from r/singularity and other subreddits on reddit. I'm planning to at some point make a list of sites that write/aggregate news that this subreddit is about so we could get news faster and not rely on reddit as much. If you know any good sites please dm me.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml
25
Will Superintelligent AI End the World? | Eliezer Yudkowsky | TED (video 11.07.2023) (youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GodOfThunder@lemm.ee to c/singularity@lemmy.fmhy.ml
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TL;DR: (AI-generated 🤖)

The author, an early pioneer in the field of aligning artificial general intelligence (AGI), expresses concern about the potential dangers of creating a superintelligent AI. They highlight the lack of understanding and control over modern AI systems, emphasizing the need to shape the preferences and behavior of AGI to ensure it doesn't harm humanity. The author predicts that the development of AGI smarter than humans, with different goals and values, could lead to disastrous consequences. They stress the urgency and seriousness required in addressing this challenge, suggesting measures such as banning large AI training runs to mitigate the risks. Ultimately, the author concludes that humanity must confront this issue with great care and consideration to avoid catastrophic outcomes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For me, the most-likely limiting factor is not the ability of a superintelligent AI to wipe out humanity -- I mean, sure, in theory, it could.

My guess is that the most-plausible potentially-limiting factor is that a superintelligent AI might destroy itself before it destroys humanity.

Remember that we (mostly) don't just fritz out or become depressed and suicide or whatever -- but we obtained that robustness by living through a couple billions of years of iterations of life where all the life forms that didn't have that property died. You are the children of the survivors, and inherited their characteristics. Everything else didn't make it. It was that brutal process over not thousands or millions, but billions of years that led to us. And even so, we sometimes aren't all that good at dealing with situations different to the one in which we evolved, like where people are forced to live in very close proximity for extended periods of time or something like that.

It may be that it's much harder than we think to design a general-purpose AI that can operate at a human-or-above level that won't just keel over and die.

This isn't to reject the idea that a superintelligent AI could be dangerous to humanity at an existential level -- just that it may be much harder than it might seem for us to create a superintelligent AI that will stay alive, harder to get to that point than it might seem. Obviously, given the potential utility of a superintelligent AI, people are going to try to create it. I am just not sure that they will necessarily be able to succeed.