this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22059 readers
33 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

just in general, the Day-Fine system (which you've probably heard of, a few countries have it) seems like a common-sense reform. its principle should probably be how we approach most fines, actually, because having them basically be flat makes... very little sense if you actually think about it:

Under Finland’s “Day-Fine” system, an individual's income is a key determinant in the size of the fine they are subsequently issued with by law enforcement. Finland was the first Nordic nation to introduce the income-based “Day Fine” system in 1921, and several European nations have followed suit since.

Further, under the Finnish “Day-Fine” system, the more a driver is over a speed limit, the higher the number “day fines” received.

[–] YoTcA@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a minimum fine, or can you drive as fast as you want as long as you do not have any income? Or how do they handle this case?

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia has a pretty comprehensive explanation of how the Finnish system works, although we also have a few Finnish posters on here so they'd probably know best if any of them would like to chime in on the nuances. in summary: it would appear the absolute minimum fine for anything subject to day-fines is 6 euros, and the minimum for "speeding in traffic" appears to be 115 euros because there is a fixed petty-fine amount associated with that offense.

load more comments (1 replies)