this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
274 points (90.3% liked)

Political Memes

5452 readers
3036 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Correct. However, both companies share a brand and other resources. Owners may hold shares in both entities, making a boycott still relevant. By abstaining from HP-branded products of all kinds, consumers can signal concerns about the broader HP ecosystem's involvement in supporting Israeli policies.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

No they don't share a brand or any resources by law. They are completely separate companies. Anyone can hold public shares in any company. You're horribly misinformed.

[–] VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

Regardless: Fuck em both

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 6 months ago

intentionally pedantic. of course the companies share intellectual, technical, supply chain, and human resources from when they were one. of course they are not in constant and open trade of those resources but they have them in common, to a degree that a boycott of one will affect the other.

pedanticism about the brand too. of course its separate by law but you are kidding yourself if you think anyone sees “Hewlett Packard” and doesn’t associate “HP”—to a degree that a boycott of one will affect the other.

further pedanticism with your “nuance” about public shares. do you think the pre-2015 owners and executives just picked a side and sold off all their non HP/HPE shares? no, they probably kept them and there is a non-insignificant crossover in ownership to a degree that a boycott of one will affect the other. hope this helps.