this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
442 points (78.2% liked)

Memes

45661 readers
1803 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

@Cowbee
2. The concept of the "withering away of the state" in Marxism refers to the gradual dissolution of state institutions as class distinctions disappear and society transitions to communism. It does not necessarily require global socialism to be achieved first, and the expansion of state power and repression under regimes like the Soviet Union contradicted this principle.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

It necessitates global Socialism to be achieved, as Capitalism stands against Socialism. The military cannot be done away with as long as there is Capitalism. Moving into Comminism without completing the negation of the negation, in dialectical-speak, is a mechanical transition that leaves the Socialist state open to invasion and plundering.

[–] Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

@Cowbee
3. While it may be true that the Soviet government provided safety nets and controlled wages, the persistence of wage labor and currency contradicted the goal of achieving a moneyless and classless society under socialism. The gradual elimination of money and wage labor was indeed a complex process, but the Soviet Union did not achieve this goal.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

The persistance of money and wages did not stand against the progress of Socialism. Again, Capitalist profit was eliminated, the state directed the products of labor, not Capitalists. Marx was not an Anarchist, he did not believe money could be done away with immediately. The USSR attempted to do away with Money, but were not yet developed enough to handle it.

[–] Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@Cowbee
4. In the Marxist sense, statelessness does entail the absence of a government as a tool of class oppression. However, it does not mean the absence of any form of governance. The Soviet state, with its centralized authority and control, did not align with the vision of statelessness as envisaged by Marx.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Statelessness comes after Socialism's contradictions have been eliminated. You are anarchist-washing Marx here.

I suggest reading Critique of the Gotha Programme.