this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
52 points (93.3% liked)

Futurology

1776 readers
91 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It might be fun but I also wouldn't want this in the hands of stupid people.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

Americans can't even tell people what gender their kid will be without setting a forrest on fire, now they want flamethrower dogs?

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I couldn't give a shit nor be bothered to worry any some imaginary scenario that's going to happen less often than a lightning strike.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

People dumb enough to buy flamethrower dogs setting a whole state on fire is an imaginary scenario?

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Roofing flame throwers have been a thing for 40 years. We not suddenly going to see a bunch of new accesses to these tools. They said the same exact shit about the not a flamethrower and here we are not burning alive from fires started by them.