Sysadmin

5584 readers

1 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml

gregf@lemmy.ml

Avian_Carrier@lemmy.ml

MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com

DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world

Oracle and SuSE responds to IBM (www.oracle.com)

submitted 1 year ago by jmp242@sopuli.xyz to c/sysadmin@lemmy.ml

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Kind of finally. SuSE https://www.suse.com/news/SUSE-Preserves-Choice-in-Enterprise-Linux/

So... I think this is kind of the worst case scenario re SuSE - an actual fork. But Oracle kind of hints at that, and Amazon already dropped a RHEL compatible AWS Linux for sort of a Fedora Server?

Obviously none of this is great, but would anyone really want Oracle leading a RHEL "close as possible" rebuild? I don't know anyone is going to downstream them.

SuSE is even weirder, as I understand it, SLE/OpenSuSE is a fork from decades ago, or at least also uses RPM? I can't imagine they get any value from trying to make a RHEL fork really... Why not push SLE? All very confusing, that's for sure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I think this is great! RHEL has a huge community and it is such a downer for Linux what IBM decided to do. SUSE is quite big in Europe and I think such a move may be able to preserve that community. At least keep it unified outside of a stupid corporation. SUSE will also probably get more people moving to their distro, not just their RHEL.

I know I want to try it out now. I didn't even know Rancher was from them.