this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
19 points (88.0% liked)

Star Trek

1218 readers
27 users here now

/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!

Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!

~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.

~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!

~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally I wasn't a fan of them, so was glad they didn't continue on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I had a hard time buying Jean-Luc Picard as a hard boiled PI, but I suppose that's the point of a holodeck program- you get to fantasize about being something you aren't if you want to.

Picard being a fan of the Dixon Hill novels, on the other hand... that seems out of character.

[–] ArtieShaw@fedia.io 3 points 7 months ago

I know a guy who is a literature snob and is probably the last person I would have expected to really get into Raymond Chandler novels. Anyway, he was raving about those books so I read a few. It turns out that Chandler was a phenomenally weird wordsmith. Inventive, funny, and unexpected. If you're looking at midcentury American writers, Chandler is hugely underrated. Maybe in a few centuries he'll get his due.

Sure, it's detective pulp. But it's detective pulp that's been given a strong hallucinogen and whacked over the head a few times before waking up in the desert.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why what's the novels?

If it's not in sorts with philosophy or whatnot, could be his guilty pleasure.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Eh, I have to admit, I have a hard time buying it, too. This is a guy who reads Shakespeare in his spare time, not trashy, pulp detective novels from the early-mid 20th century. He even thought taking a trip on The Orient Express would be too indulgent. Picard liking Dixon Hill novels makes no sense. Just like off-roading in an ATV.

Patrick Stewart, on the other hand…

[–] Lemming421@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

However much you enjoy fine dining, now and again, you just want a dodgy burger from the van parked outside the student union.

There’s a reason Dan Brown was so popular. Some times, you need a bit of trash in your life.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

You do. I do. Others do. But let’s not pretend either of us are anywhere close to Jean-Luc Picard.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Maybe, but the rest of the time you see him reading something, it's some great work of literature.