Technology

34912 readers

151 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

Do you think the turing test allows for any other conclusion than "it's a relatively good AI"? (feddit.de)

submitted 2 years ago by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/technology@lemmy.ml

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't really think so. I am not really sure why, but my gut feeling is that being good at impersonating a human being in text conversation doesn't mean you're closer to creating a real AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I completely agree with this. Brains basically evolved to create an efficient simulation of the physical environment that we exist in. Any AI that would have human style consciousness needs to have embodiment either in a physical or a virtual environment. If we evolve AI agents in a physical environment and they learn to interact with it meaningfully, then we could teach them language and communicate with them in a meaningful way because we'll have a shared context.