this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
984 points (96.0% liked)

memes

10278 readers
2548 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

You will get more people to join your cause with a positive message: i.g. "Do these small steps to start" than a negative one, I.g. "If you don't go fully vegan, you are still part of the problem."

"Perfect is the enemy of good."

So it is easier to convince people to reduce meat consumption, which than makes it more likely that people will go vegetarian or vegan later

And i actually feel like vegans on the internet can be too aggressive, alienating people they could get on their side

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

best is the enemy of better.

why are you giving vegans advice on how to market veganism? if the facts won't change your mind then it's not the fault of the vegans.

[–] No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because I want more people to become vegan and the way most people on the internet argue does not help this goal

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I also want more vegans. there is no right way to change someone's mind. attack the problem from different angles is my view.

All compassion is good compassion

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If you feel facts are "aggressive", the problem is you, not the facts.

[–] No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago

Of course facts can be aggressive

Let's assume you talk to someone from a first world country. It is aggressive to say your lifestyle is responsible for the death of children in the developmental world, you are indirectly a murderer

It is more helpful to say: try fair-trade chlothes and check for companies that you buy from

Dividing society does not help better it

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago

The facts aren't agressive, it is the tone.

[–] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

It's kind of hard to approach this in a tactful way. I think a lot of why vegans don't appreciate this approach is because it often doesn't work in actual practice. I'll give a personal example as an analogy - I used to be a smoker. I tried quitting at least 50 times over the time period I was addicted to nicotine. One of the tricks I would use was to reduce the amount I would smoke each day. It would help briefly, but what would always happen is that I would get to a point where it was too hard to reduce any further, and then after plateauing for a few days, I would rebound and smoke even more than I used to.

Reduction still played a role in my effort to quit, but there were a lot of other tricks I had to employ to make it stick, and the overarching point is that reduction as a goal went nowhere, but reduction combined with the intent to stop all together did eventually work.

And that's what also happens with dietary changes. Reduction starts with halfway good intentions, but when it's the goal it becomes a temporary self-soothe that simply ends up rebounding in the end. In fact the people who run wfpb health coaching clinics have stated in interviews that people are most successful when they go all in with the dietary changes - because it turns out that people often feel dramatic positive changes to their health within only days of going plant-based, and those positive changes reinforce their motivation to keep going.

And as this article points out, reducitarianism can never achieve justice. It's like when suits-wearers promise to reduce their carbon emissions by 10% by 2035 or something. It's better than nothing, but will never solve the problems that need to be solved.

https://www.surgeactivism.org/reducetarianism

[–] flerp@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago

Your comment is about looking down on people... tongue in cheek or not, this is always the kind of stuff people post before complaining that the big mean vegans are alienating them... victim complex much?