this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
65 points (94.5% liked)

Australia

3595 readers
251 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
65
Australian prime minister labels Elon Musk ‘an arrogant billionaire who thinks he is above the law’ (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 6 months ago by tardigrada@beehaw.org to c/australia@aussie.zone
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Australia’s prime minister has labelled X’s owner, Elon Musk, an “arrogant billionaire who thinks he is above the law” as the rift deepens between Australia and the tech platform over the removal of videos of a violent stabbing in a Sydney church.

On Monday evening in an urgent last-minute federal court hearing, the court ordered a two-day injunction against X to hide posts globally containing the footage of the alleged stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel on 15 April. The eSafety commissioner had previously directed X to remove the posts, but X had only blocked them from access in Australia pending a legal challenge.

Anthony Albanese on Tuesday said Musk was “a bloke who’s chosen ego and showing violence over common sense”.

“Australians will shake their head when they think that this billionaire is prepared to go to court fighting for the right to sow division and to show violent videos,” he told Sky News. “He is in social media, but he has a social responsibility in order to have that social licence.”

“What the eSafety commissioner is doing is doing her job to protect the interests of Australians. And the idea that someone would go to court for the right to put up violent content on a platform shows how out of touch Mr Musk is,” he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danbeeston@mastodon.social 6 points 6 months ago (5 children)

@ajsadauskas @quicken @tardigrada @mrkvnz Australia should host a Government server and provide a default account for each citizen. Make it an official point of information for the nation.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds a bit too much like the Australia Card.

Also, it would also be government-controlled media.

[–] danbeeston@mastodon.social 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

@Salvo That could be a problem. I just wish there was a tax-payer solution so we weren't at the beck and call of either corporations, billionaires nor flaky benefactors. It should all be like the ABC but for social media.

[–] skribe@aus.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@danbeeston @Salvo publicly funded, independently run.

[–] ajsadauskas@aus.social 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@skribe @danbeeston @Salvo The other option would be to set up an official gov.au Mastodon instance, and give each government department, agency, and Parliamentarian an official account.

People can then have their choice of instance, whether that's community run or private (e.g. Threads).

In the longer term, there might be scope for some other government institutions — particularly universities — to set up their own instances as well.

[–] skribe@aus.social 1 points 6 months ago

@ajsadauskas @danbeeston @Salvo plus the states as well ultimately. But until I see The ABC setting up instances I'm skeptical.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

I think community funded is a better option than either directly or indirectly government funded. This is what is so great about the Fediverse.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

It might be better to legislate more power and enforcement capabilities to regulate social media companies. Many of them are close to monopolies in their niches and their network effects make competition almost impossible.

I do believe there are areas where it is more ethical and efficient for government to operate services (eg policing, public hospitals, emergency services, schools) but I don't believe social media is one of them.

[–] StryderNotavi@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Honestly, better to just have an official government server with official government accounts.

They can then federate as needed - official correspondence would be recognizable as it comes from their domain.

Meanwhile people would be able to remain on the servers they've chosen and follow whatever is of interest.

[–] mrkvnz@fosstodon.org 1 points 6 months ago

@danbeeston @ajsadauskas @quicken @tardigrada

They should, at least have their own federated systems at all levels of government.

My initial boost onto these services was during the bigger floods. (2011) The bird site was invaluable source of information, and I wonder how that’s going to be handle for the next one.