this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
888 points (98.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21272 readers
533 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    888
    systemdeez nuts (sh.itjust.works)
    submitted 6 months ago by silverchase@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    206 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Yeah i remember debian installs sysvinit if you apt remove systemd and installs systemd if you apt remove sysvinit

    [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    haha why does debian bother adding this rule if the system will be left in broken state anyway

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe because its still not a broken state? They could still add init files ig

    [–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    (As the tester above) It is a broken state

    It failed to install the initscripts package because apt bailed out

    apt —fix-broken install got you a little closer, but the screenshot didn’t say they tried that

    My bet is this worked when systemd was first introduced, but since there’s not much use for it now, and sysvinit is deprecated, it just doesn’t accidentally work anymore

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I mean you still can use cli? So you can technically make an init file and boot?

    [–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    You can’t - it’s just asking what runlevel to launch, and there are no files for any runlevel

    You’d need to add init=/bin/sh through grub at that point

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    How are you running apt then?

    [–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I didn’t after breaking it and rebooting

    I restored the snapshot from before breaking the system and tried to see what would happen if I didn’t just reboot after apt bailed out

    [–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social -1 points 6 months ago

    As long as you can run vim, gcc and make, it's not broken.