this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
441 points (86.1% liked)

Political Memes

5236 readers
2052 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Me too. Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The real problem, is people being stupid enough to believe owning guns is going to protect them from a fascist government. (Hint they won’t)

The only hope is voting against fascists NOW. Once they get control, that gun in your closet ain’t going to save you.

I have a kind of problem with rhetoric like this, because it implies that shooting and killing fascists is broadly an ineffective tactic, which I do not believe to be the case

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Shooting and killing fascists generally is not effective as a spontaneous demonstration of opposition.

If you've ascended to the point of shooting and killing fascists, acquiring weapons is probably pretty low on your list of practical problems to solve (in order to be able to shoot and kill fascists).

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Shooting and killing fascists generally is not effective as a spontaneous demonstration of opposition.

I mean do we have a whole lot of like, examples of this happening as a case of action? I really can't think of any, I dunno if we'd be able to ascertain it's efficacy without that.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Lots, generally in the lead-up and early years of fascist takeovers. Lone wolf assassinations, attacks by small groups, the like. The 20s had numerous anti-fascist assassinations, and the early-mid 30s had anti-Nazi assassinations.

Effective resistance movements only develop out of the roots of organization, direction, and subversion, at which point there are numerous paths to getting the needed weapons and shooting some fascists. Prior gun ownership is a footnote in such operations at best - a liability at worst.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

The other points are well taken, I wasn't really thinking so much along those lines. Dunno so much what lines I was thinking along honestly. Probably armed resistance leading up to a fascist government, including armed protest sort of thing, which doesn't really involve shooting people so much as it does just kinda standing around with a gun so other people don't get shot most of the time, I think.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Do you have a problem with gravity? I mean it's going to be the same thing... Especially since most of the gun nuts that believe "they could do something" are going to be cheering the fascist government on while it goes after lbqt, immigrants, non Christians, libtards... And by the time they realize something's wrong there ain't going to be jack shit to do about it. (See Nazi Germany in the late 30's when the population started realizing this shit might not be cool) History repeats...