People Twitter

4968 readers

843 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying.
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1590

There's no coming back from that (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

193 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hedidwot@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nope... Uses toner instead, and is typically much longer lasting than ink, doesn't clog like ink, cheaper per page than ink.

Doesn't do as good at extreme quality photographs as ink but does everything else better than ink.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

An acceptable flaw for what it offers instead.

[–] ToyDork@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Indeed. Personally, I've gone completely paperless just to avoid printers entirely. I can't afford a printer at all when most are temporary at best, and Brother is outside of my price range when I never need physical papers in the first place.

My dad has a Brother printer though, so can confirm they're somewhat better. Unfortunately, my dad owns a years-old iMac, so he has to not have the most recent available OS version or there won't be any working drivers; Macs have apparently become infamous for not supporting printers after even the most necessary of system updates, so his computer remains a huge security risk just so his printer works.