this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
269 points (96.9% liked)

Uplifting News

11391 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's in fact why some universities patent their research stuff in the first place, to ensure nobody else can. They'll then make it a policy to take 0€ in licensing fees, but this precludes anybody else from starting to lock the tech behind money.

Source: My uni back in the days had a few dozen patents for exactly this reason, too.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

IANAL but patents rely on originality, meaning a preprint of the original paper is basically enough to make the technology impossible to patent. Well probably more than just the paper I guess.

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

Not anymore. The US switched from a "first-to-invent" system to a "first-to-file." Prior art doesn't matter for shit.

[–] Nithanim@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

I learned it too that it has to be "new". Most likely it is a hell of a lot easier to directly patent it and have a strong legal foundation than just wait around and scramble for proof if it needs to be. Probably also helps being picked up by the industry.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yep. At max a university will take back its investment amount so that they can operationalize this sort of activity.