this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
1099 points (95.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32426 readers
811 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? I thought it was less complicated since you don't need subnet masks or NAT

[–] ruben@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, subnet masks are not used in IPv6? Hell fucking yeah.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah IPv6 has some pretty sweet innovations baked in. More efficient packets and routing, reduced performance hit by oversized broadcast domains, etc. But potentially problematically it technically does not allow for NAT so every computer has a publicly routable IP address. It does however have a very nice system for link-local networks.

I think the biggest brainfuck for IPv6 is managing a dual stack network because you end up translating concepts between IPv4 and IPv6 that really aren't meant to be translated