this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
689 points (97.3% liked)

Open Source

31224 readers
332 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://mastodon.online/@dominikasafko/112270427923307005

Just a friendly reminder example for all those people who only ever heard of GIMP and not wanting to let go of their Adobe products because they don't like GIMP. Krita deserves more wide spread attention. https://krita.org/en/features/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 0 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I think you are wrong. Both tools allow for editing images in general purpose. What exactly do you even mean? The tools are there like in GIMP and as easy to reach and remember. Just because the one program has better brushes than the other does not invalidate the usage of everything else. And even if you were right, it would be helpful if someone creates tutorials like on GIMP.

[–] strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hmm, I'm not expressing my opinion, these are the statements from the creators of the tools themselves

Krita is a professional FREE and open source painting program. It is made by artists that want to see affordable art tools for everyone.

It IS a painting program, the reason why you can do a lot of the same things that you can in GIMP is because all of those features are useful in both to both painters and editors

GIMP is a multi-tool it can do illustration but it's focus is more general purpose and more on being an GNU Image Manipulation Program

Again, these are not my opinions, these are objectionable facts taken from the source.

If you disagree with these you are fine to do so, but telling people they are wrong is just ridiculous and looks wilfully ignorant or argumentative

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Again, these are not my opinions, these are objectionable facts taken from the source.

Just because a statement as an objective fact, does not make it to one. If a program is suited for general purpose editing is an opinion. And what the developers say doesn't matter in this point. We have our own judgement and opinion.

If you disagree with these you are fine to do so, but telling people they are wrong is just ridiculous and looks wilfully ignorant or argumentative

But you are doing it yourself (with the argumentation it being an objective fact). So if you call people out, then don't do it yourself. If people are wrong, then I will tell them they are wrong. Krita is a better general purpose editing tool than GIMP is.

But guys like you are just repeating what others say, even if its wrong. Krita is not a painting tool, it is a tool that does painting and general purpose editing. It does not matter what you call the application and how it is marketed from the developers. It is better suited as a general editing tool than GIMP. And I use GIMP since 2008 or so.

[–] strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well you haven't convinced me

load more comments (2 replies)