this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
569 points (92.8% liked)

Uplifting News

11407 readers
52 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudSkipperKisser@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Yes, it is. $275m is a lot more than I’ll ever be able to contribute to society

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 68 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

That's because you haven't extracted 95 times that first.

I guarantee you - even if you haven't paid a single penny in tax your entire life, by virtue of not being a billionaire, you have contributed significantly more to society than this leech ever has or will.

It's scary how good a job the billionaires have done in convincing you (and many many others) it's somehow the other way around.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago

Let's imagine a village a few thousand years ago, at harvest time. There's one guy who's physically much bigger than the others, didn't do any work for the crop, and stands there with a sword to steal 80% of everything everyone else has harvested.

Then a day later he holds a gathering where he gives back 10% of what he stole and people cheer him for being charitable, because in the other villages the people who steal the grain don't give any back at all.

Crazy.

There's practically no other issues on Earth than ones caused by greedy rich people. We have the resources and technology to end world hunger and do other such things, but they aren't being done because there's no immediate profit to be extracted from it. Even though on a global, socioeconomic level, it would have massive effects, which would actually translate to better markets and profits even for capitalists, but they just need to get immediate profit, the blind ignorant fucks.

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 7 months ago

It's scary how good a job the billionaires have done in convincing you (and many many others) it's somehow the other way around.

Its honestly the one of the great psyops of history.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 24 points 7 months ago

$275m is money he took from other people's excess production.

He didn't make that money: he stole it and got lucky.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are no good billionaires get it through your head.

[–] Kroxx@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I buy my meds from his online store that he set up solely to compete with the absurd pricing of pharmaceuticals in the us. Saving a good bit too. He also made millionaires of most of the employees from his first successful business before he was a billionaire. I hate billionaires and he has surely done some fucked up things, but Mark Cuban does seem to be cut from a different cloth. I definitely appreciate his pharmacy.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The thing is, there was only ever one good billionaire and he gave his money away to such a degree he was no longer a billionaire. While Mark Cuban has done good, surely even saved and improved many lives, he still has a billion more ways to do so. Plenty of good millionaires out in the world, there are no good billionaires.

The mere concept of a billion anything is so hard to comprehend that it serves repeating.

One million seconds is 12 days. One billion seconds is 32 years.

[–] PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Millionaires good. Billionaires bad.

:/

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Millionaires (can be) good. Billionaires (are always) bad.

[–] PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You one of those "if you have more money than me, you have too much money" folks?

[–] PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Actually the opposite. I love coming here and watching the anti-capitalist screech about "rich man bad poor man good". I have no feelings against billionaires one way or the other.

I was simply pointing out the hypocrisy of calling billionaires bad guys, but giving millionaires a pass.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's not hypocrisy. A billionaire is orders of magnitudes richer than a millionaire. A millionaire doesn't have nearly the same capacity to do overwhelming good as a billionaire does.

A millionaire who chooses not to use their money to help isn't good but a billionaire who chooses not to use their money to help is decidedly evil.

Much like how you not giving half your sandwich to a homeless guy isn't good but a restaurant that throws out perfectly good food at the end of the night directly next to a homeless shelter is decidedly evil.

[–] PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I love how you decide what good and bad means. If I am in possession of, say, $500 million, I'm not a bad person if I don't use it to help others. It is not an individuals responsibility to give away their money to "make society better". That's your government leaders job. Nor am I a bad person for eating my 12" hoagie while I walk past a homeless guy. It's my sandwich. I paid for it.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep, I do decide what good and bad means. The fucking concept of taxes disagrees with everything you said so kindly fuck off back to your hole, corpo rat.

[–] PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Hahaha. Yeeeeeah. Stay mad, brother! Fight the machine! Don't worry. One day glorious communism will take it's rightful place at the top!

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago

He didn't contribute that, workers did.