this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
242 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
248 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Exec@pawb.social 33 points 1 year ago (23 children)

I forgot Evernote was still a thing. Used it for a short while back in 2012 when there were not many decent note taking apps.

[–] simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Ever since I discovered LogSeq and Obsidian, I stopped checking out other note-taking software

[–] penis@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love Obsidian but haven't heard of LogSeq, do you use both but for different things?

[–] simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

They are very similar. The main differences are:

  • LogSeq uses bullet points. Obsidian is just pure markdown
  • LogSeq is open source. Obsidian is closed source
  • LogSeq has a predefined structure to it (folders). Obsidian allows you to have whatever folders you want

Personally, I use LogSeq for my day to day work. Primarily because I prefer the bullet point approach when taking notes. But some people would prefer writing long continuous text with Obsidian.

So to each their own. If you're interested, try both (they're both using markdown, so you can transfer between the two). I went back and forth a few times before settling with LogSeq

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)