this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
997 points (93.4% liked)

Antiwork/Work Reform

17 readers
1 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.9k

Date Created: June 15, 2023

Date Updated: July 17, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, I deleted my comment because I realized that I misread the post I was replying to.

To respond to this post, yes, that is problematic if you care about the workability of the system, but if you have morals, then weather or not the system works is moot.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And, again, morals don't enter into it. People deserve to be paid for the work that they do, and it doesn't matter what that work is.

Isn't that what the whole "anti-work" is about? Paying people what they deserve to be paid, right? Why do you think people involved in food production or distribution deserve any less? They work as hard, or harder, than you or I do. Nobody should expect them to work for free "because food should be a right, man!"

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ok, but why do people deserve to get paid for their work? That seems like a moralist statement. Is there deeper rational supporting that statement, or is that a moral imperative for you?

Edit: to be clear I'm not disagreeing with the premise, I just want your reasoning for arriving at it.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one -2 points 1 year ago

Super simple. My time is valuable to me, if you ask me to contribute my time for something that benefits you, I need to be compensated for my time.

I can choose to donate my time, but doing so comes at a cost to me and if I contribute too much of my time, then I can't pay bills, my electricity gets turned off, I get evicted, and so on.

Do you value yourself so little that you work for free? If so, I've got some housework you can do!

[–] Metallibus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People deserve to be paid for the work that they do, and it doesn't matter what that work is.

Yeah, this. This right here. This is exactly why your argument falls apart.

We have people in the US who have jobs, but can't afford to keep a roof over their head and to feed themselves. The argument people are making is that they deserve food, and not to fucking starve to death. You're arguing that they need to give someone money so they don't starve.

People are arguing what work they do shouldn't matter, and you're agreeing. But because of the western views on capitalism and western views on social programs, you're claiming that the food producers won't get money and therefore are essentially saying these people should starve.

These people tend to work jobs that the upper class doesn't want to do. But for some reason, you're arguing they also don't deserve appropriate pay or the right to a safe life.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

You adjust for that by making sure everyone is paid, not by paying food producers nothing.

People working to produce and distribute food deserve to be paid like anyone else. You don't provide for other people by making food free, that's how you ensure NO food gets produced.

See:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/migrant-workers-said-to-be-leaving-florida-restrictive-new-immigration-drivers-license-law/