this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
957 points (99.1% liked)

Atheist Memes

5578 readers
138 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
fkn@lemmy.world
friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
Donjuanme@lemmy.world
Not2Dopey@sh.itjust.works
957
Weed (midwest.social)
submitted 7 months ago by Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Fun story, in older translations of the bible, this verse is "a man who sleeps with his apprentice must be stoned. "

But king James' advisors didn't want their proclivities deemed immoral by the religious text they were translating for the masses.

I don't believe the are any other mentions of homosexuality in any other book of the modern English language Christian bible. AFAIK there aren't any mentions in the Talmud- which the old testament is roughly based on.

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I never heard the apprentice translation. Just that it could also be interpreted as many sleeping with "boy", implying pedophilia.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

It's less "child/boy" and more "person I'm responsible for"

The OG writers of the bible didn't want people abusing their positions of power. Some modern bible scholars would like to reinforce that it's "boy" not "ward" in older translations. The cynic in me believes they intentionally focus on that translation because they want to sleep with their parishioners

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

I don't know enough of the text to know these things, so I appreciate it.

I'm also not going to bother learning it any more than I already do, since it would have no impact on my life, either knowing or not knowing it.

Considering that, I'm glad I can ask the question and get a good response about it. Thanks.