this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
536 points (98.6% liked)

Atheist Memes

5578 readers
138 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14119731

Here are two sources I found:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Well personally I'm aware that literally none of it happened, so might as well have some fun about the most insane parts rather than a simple dupe hack 😉

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To be fair there was a census. It just happened much earlier and had no requirement to travel to your ancestor's home.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I love it when a world religion is based on misunderstanding government regulations 😄

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Well personally I’m aware that literally none of it happened

Abundant evidence of Messiah figures running around the Levant during the reign of Emperor Tiberius. Whether "Jesus" was one guy or a composite, you're stretching skepticism to assert the Sermon on the Mount as an event that didn't happened.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's fanfiction about a cult leader at best.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Letters: I am Paul, I am so great

Epistles: James was great

Mark: Paul was great

Matthew: Paul was great we agree let me tell you why James wasn't great

Luke: you know what? Both were pretty great

John: I am going to add a character in the last season to boost the ratings

Revelations: magic mushrooms fanfic

[–] Zabjam@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

There is evidence of New York existing and there is evidence of spiders existing. Does that mean I am stretching my skepticism when I say I am convinced that Spiderman does not exist?

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Fun fact if you pray to spiderman your wishes will be answered at the same rate as if you pray to Jesus.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I can go to Times Square right now and find half a dozen guys dressed in Spiderman costumes running around. And I can produce a litany of live action video that is significantly more convincing than any artifacts you could produce to prove the existence of Caeser Augustus or Abraham Lincoln or Winston Churchill. Hell, I can even get you video of a guy in a Spiderman costume who is climbing a high rise in Los Angeles right here

If a video of a guy climbing a building in a Spiderman costume was paired with a handful of comic books, and this was discovered in a sealed vault in the year 4024 AD, what kind of conversation would we be having?

[–] Zabjam@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a video of Jesus?

Finding a 6000 year old video of Spiderman would not change the discussion at all (besides questions about modern technology that supposedly is thousands of years old). We do have modern movies that show a Spiderman. Just like those, a video tape of a 6000 year old human spider is not proof that human-spider hybrids exist. It just proves that there are people who pretend to be a Spiderman.

So, stories about Jesus performing miracles can (maybe) be proof of people having existed who claimed or were said to be a Jesus. But they don't prove that miracles are a thing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So, stories about Jesus performing miracles can (maybe) be proof of people having existed who claimed or were said to be a Jesus. But they don’t prove that miracles are a thing.

The Sermon on the Mount only becomes a miracle when you add in fish magic. Before that point, it's just a story about a guy who gives a speech and covers the tab for lunch.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just because there were Messiah figures does not mean that you get to argue your particular one existed. A class has a population, that doesn't mean X exists or was a member of that class.

We can be very confident that James existed, we have people writing about his school/organization/temple, at least one person claims to have met him, and we have the fourth Gospel whose path very likely came via his group. Now, since we got James we have to ask can we get a particular Messiah figure that was either his brother or so close that people said he was his brother? Any random Messiah figure isn't going to cut it. It's not enough that there were street preachers, we need one connected to James.

And no I don't think the Sermon on the Mount happened. It is likely Matthew and Luke (Sermon on the Plain) were copying from the same source. A written pastoral document that was no where near as well written.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Just because there were Messiah figures does not mean that you get to argue your particular one existed.

Fortunately, there's a bit more evidence on the table in the form of oral and written testimonials, art objects, and buildings dedicated in his name.

We can be very confident that James existed, we have people writing about his school/organization/temple, at least one person claims to have met him, and we have the fourth Gospel whose path very likely came via his group. Now, since we got James we have to ask can we get a particular Messiah figure that was either his brother or so close that people said he was his brother?

If we're crediting the Gospel of James as a credible record of an individual's existence, I'm hard pressed to dismiss the Gospels of Mark and Luke, which are older and at least as credible.

And no I don’t think the Sermon on the Mount happened.

So we're putting all our chips on "A particular popular rabbi with a large following never got on top of a hill and held a sermon in front of an audience that failed to bring enough food along for lunch"?

And the argument boils down to "I just don't think the Q-document is credible enough"?

shrug

Of all the various parables and miraculous events attributed in the New Testament, I would consider "Guy gives speech to large hungry crowd and then feeds them" one of the least controversial.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fortunately, there’s a bit more evidence on the table in the form of oral and written testimonials, art objects, and buildings dedicated in his name.

Only contemporary first hand evidence. Not what some zealots said nine centuries later.

f we’re crediting the Gospel of James as a credible record of an individual’s existence, I’m hard pressed to dismiss the Gospels of Mark and Luke, which are older and at least as credible.

No. I am crediting Paul since I can't see why on earth he would make up a character like James, I am crediting the Gospel of Thomas as predating Mark and mentioning him, I am also pointing out that we can see traces of his impact in John. I don't need the Gospel of James. Btw Luke just copied Matthew and Matthew just coped Mark.

So we’re putting all our chips on “A particular popular rabbi with a large following never got on top of a hill and held a sermon in front of an audience that failed to bring enough food along for lunch”?

I don't think the man existed. And even if he had existed and gave that speech I think you are ignoring the fact that the miracle is clearly a reference to the OT story about food multiplication. It isn't that it is impossible to have happened it is there is an easier way to explain where the story came from. Imagine a thousand years from now someone like you is arguing for Spiderman and saying "isn't it possible someone could swing around the city". "Sure but the people at that time had a story about a superhero who could do that so that is where it probably came from".

Of all the various parables and miraculous events attributed in the New Testament, I would consider “Guy gives speech to large hungry crowd and then feeds them” one of the least controversial.

Cool? None of them happened. Every single miracle he performs we can trace back to the literature that existed at the time.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

None of them happened.

Again, we have ample documentation from the era to conclude a Rabbi gave a speech on a hill to a crowd

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Show it to me. Contemporary evidence only