this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
774 points (94.5% liked)

You Should Know

32987 readers
142 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There's some misinformation floating around regarding Lemmy not having a karma system. While many have discovered otherwise, this is for those who may not have.

While it's not exposed in the Lemmy default user interface, Lemmy does have a fully functional karma system and it is visible in third party clients such as WefWef and Memmy.

Do with that what you will.

https://join-lemmy.org/api/interfaces/PersonAggregates.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I know I'm in the minority here, but I think the karma system has value and I'd like to see us keep it. I did time as a moderator on a fairly busy subreddit, and requiring accounts to be >30 days old and have >100 or so karma saved us a lot of work. E.g., it made ban evasion a little harder to do, and reduced brigading.

It also helped to keep folks fairly civil and promoted considering perspective when posting, which I think is valuable.

With that said, I'd LOVE to allow communities to disable down votes... it's a missing feature in reddit, and if you are trying to promote discussion of a divisive topic, or to actively suppress an echo chamber, I think down votes are counter productive.

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

requiring accounts to be >30 days old and have >100 or so karma saved us a lot of work. E.g., it made ban evasion a little harder to do, and reduced brigading.

Counter-point: Requirements such as these were the reason repost/copy-paste bots were getting so rampant on Reddit.

[–] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Kinda, but not really... if you are a user who has had your account for more than 5 minutes and you're not a troll, odds are you never run into those rules.

The repost / copy paste bots were mostly to build a believable strawman that could be sold for astroturfing / "viral marketing", etc.

[–] entropicshart@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Requiring accounts with X days or X karma lead to subs where people would literally post just to get upvotes and the creation of bot accounts.

[–] emptyother@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Should probably be a per-server karma system. Or else anyone could create their own instance and auto-give themselves enough karma to be "trustworthy" and set their account date.

[–] MrAegis@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

This is already possible on a per-server basis. Beehaw already does this.

It would be interesting to make it a per-community feature though.

[–] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely seems like that would end with defederating that server

[–] ryannathans@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Good luck detecting it

[–] zikk_transport2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'd LOVE to allow communities to disable down votes...

Upvote-only system is bullshit and you also know it. How else would you motivate user to post a quality content? Karma should also exist for this exact reason.

I don't want yet-another-facebook-or-youtube here. 🤷

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People that post quality content don’t tend to care about internet points. People that care about internet points won’t bother to collect them via posting quality content.

Downvote systems can also discourage open discussion, as too many people can’t help themselves from downvoting dissenting views. Communities end up one sided hiveminds.

Maybe there is a middle ground, perhaps downvotes could be rationed instead of outright disabled.

[–] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think downvote rationing could work, possibly. It is only an issue for subs that are focused on discussion of divisive topics... downvotes work fine for most communities

[–] BraBraBra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Being left on one would be the equivalent of being downvoted. What's the difference? Downvotws often just serves as a fuck you, and makes people feel like they're being attacked.

[–] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not every sub is for "quality content", some subs are intended for debate / dialogue between people that disagree with each other, and use the downvote button to mean "disagree" ... which means if you are coming for a quality dialogue, you tend to only see a quality monologue unless the user base is split 50/50 on the topic, which is rare.

[–] Spider89@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You had my approval until: I'd LOVE to allow communities to disable down votes...

No... Just No...

[–] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

yeah, like if we pick a certain flair, down votes will be disabled to prevent echo chamber for a certain conversation

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So no free and open discussion then? Only approved group think will be allowed?

I understand the benifits of what you are asking, but those are the very things that lead Reddit to what it is now.

[–] clgoh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does requiring a minimum account age cause group think?

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It was more of a response to the minimum account karma.

Account age is reasonable enough, after the service has grown a bit more.

However, if people start getting banned for the wrong reasons and have to create new accounts to be able to have discussion. It does create a barrier for that discussion to take place.

[–] clgoh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

if people start getting banned for the wrong reasons

What would be good or bad reasons?

[–] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It is seriously difficult to have negative account karma on reddit unless you are an outright troll.

[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Requiring basic levels of karma or age is not “group think.”

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

requiring basic levels of karma most certainly is. You have to say the right things first to get the group approval before you can contribute.

[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

requiring basic levels of karma most certainly is. You have to say the right things first to get the group approval before you can contribute.

Again, I disagree. You can say the “right things,” certainly, or you can say “neutral things.” Really anything short of overt hostility would be acceptable.

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that is too idealistic. It could very easily go into a downward spiral that a community could never get out of. It happens already on several subreddits already. You may not have experienced it, but I can say it for certain happens. There have even been scifi series written about it that have taken the concept to the extreme.

[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think that is too idealistic. It could very easily go into a downward spiral that a community could never get out of. It happens already on several subreddits already. You may not have experienced it, but I can say it for certain happens. There have even been scifi series written about it that have taken the concept to the extreme.

I’m familiar with some of the subreddits, but I believe you’re taking the spiral too steeply and too quickly.

The “don’t be a dick” philosophy will get you more than enough karma to comment on whatever subreddit you want to participate in, outside of some super niche ones.

[–] ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have controversial opinions just post them on controversial subs as well. A large part of "the right things" depends on the "right community"

[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If you have controversial opinions just post them on controversial subs as well. A large part of "the right things" depends on the "right community"

That is entirely correct.

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But not 'being a dick' is far too subjective in a global village... The world does not beat to one drum.

I have to stand on eggshells with my language around USamericans as an example.

[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But not 'being a dick' is far too subjective in a global village... The world does not beat to one drum.

While I hear what you’re saying, it’s really not as complicated as you’re making it out to be.

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I really don't think you do, you are being incredibly closed minded and sticking your head in the sand. Because it has no* effect on you (yet).

[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really don't think you do, you are being incredibly closed minded and sticking your head in the sand. Because it has no* effect on you (yet).

That is a bold assumption to make. I’ve absolutely been affected by it on Reddit, and I’ve been banned from subreddits from saying the “wrong” things. Hell, I’m a lesbian who was banned from r/ActualLesbians because I said lesbians are attracted to women and not non-men.

I’m not sticking my head in the sand.

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That sounds nothing like what we are talking about at all. Weird knee-jerk reaction. I feel like you are being a dick about this.

[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like you are being a dick about this.

Funny, I could say the same about you.

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you seeing my point now?

Have you seen anyone downvoting you? Even when you’re acting like a stubborn fool, your karma for this conversation hasn’t been negatively impacted.

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone has been downvoting me every time I get a response from you on each comment.

[–] Chathtiu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Someone has been downvoting me every time I get a response from you on each comment.

That’s interesting. That’s not what I can see on my end, but then again Memmy has been pretty glitchy the last few days.

[–] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, what? That's the opposite of my point. I think most subs benefit from outright trolling and off topic nonsense being prohibited, but my issue is that downvotes promote group think, and on a discussion sub, you should be able to limit or remove them.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Voat had a system where you only had ten downvotes a day. Kept people in check

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Voat

Kept people in check

I don't think so dude.