this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
49 points (98.0% liked)

Canada

7133 readers
458 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If only we had a government that could stop the rich and corporations from buying houses posted at under 1M (and index it to minimum wage or something)

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The way to do that is to tax them.

Price controls don't work--there's a long and ugly list of examples of why--but increasing marginal taxation certain does work. We just stopped doing it because..mumble..mumble..supply-side..mumble..trickle-down..mumble..job creators..mumble.

You simply tax the things that harm society until those things go away.

Corporations owning residential homes should get taxed an extra 1% on the total value of the home every year, increasing at 2x the rate of inflation every January 1st. Do that for 5 years, then apply the tax to individuals who own more than one home, same deal - 1% + 2x the rate of inflation.

Combined with actual rent controls, this solves the problem, and it won't shock the system and cause a housing crash, because various homes are at different stages of profitability.

I'm just some idiot on the internet. Why can't some idiot in government come up with a similar plan?

[–] doylio@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

The history of price controls suggests this will not give the outcome one would expect