this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
74 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22059 readers
87 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

French courts have been imposing disproportionately severe sentences for minor offenses, including 10 months in prison for stealing a can of Red Bull and one year for a homeless boy with schizophrenia caught looting a luxury store. The overwhelmed courts rush cases, provide minimal time for defendants, and prioritize punishment under the instruction of the Justice Minister. Furthermore, the French government is censoring social media and justifying it by claiming to protect public order, but it infringes upon free speech and mirrors tactics used by authoritarian regimes. The justice system exhibits a double standard, favoring the privileged, and creates a class divide, leading to unrest. Ironically, the government compares itself to oppressive nations while undermining democratic principles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AntonAmo@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is fucked up! It is kind of scary how even here in Germany the news coverage is skewed in favour of Macron recently. Kind of framing it as a migrant revolt. You only hear about the riots in france but no background info about why it is happening and what measures are taken. At the same time you hear about France starting to spy on citizens smartphones and just ask yourself what the fuck is happening. Thanks for the translation!

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The other thing that has become completely discarded in the narrative is the fact that this instability began with Macron's antidemocratic cram-through of laws dismantling France's social state.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

His increase of the retirement age from 62 to 64, bringing it more in line with its EU neighbors (though still below all but two of them)? France's constitutional court had no problem with it. A bill to repeal the reform was proposed but failed to pass when a majority of representatives voted against it. This doesn't seem terribly anti-democratic to me.

Note also that this retirement age increase wasn't done for no reason. The pension system is suffering from more expenses and less revenue as the demographics of France tilt more toward the elderly. This was done to keep the pension system as a whole in the black.

[–] Ashiette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

The democratic way would have been to submit the bill to increase the retirement age to vote. It wasn't voted. It was imposed.

The bill to repeal the reform wasn't passed not because representatives voted against it. That's not how it works. It didn't pass because it didn't gain enough votes. Because you would HAVE to vote AGAINST the assembly, which is not the same as voting against a law.

Then again, it wasn't done to keep the pension system as a whole. It was done to alleviate corporate social funding. The pension system wasn't lacking.

Sorry for the lack of sources, I'm on mobile. If you want them I can search for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)